Frank Schmidt

Meta-Analysis Articles

• Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results (Schmidt, Oh, and Hayes, 2009)
• Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta-Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge (Hunter and Schmidt, 2000)
• Detecting and Correcting the Lies That Data Tell (Schmidt, 2010)
• Meta-Analysis: A Constantly Evolving Research Integration Tool (Schmidt, 2008)
• Refinements in Validity Generalization Methods: Implications for the Situational Specificity Hypothesis (Schmidt, Law, Hunter, Rothstein, Pearlman, and McDaniel, 1993)
• Nonlinearity of Range Corrections in Meta-Analysis: Test of an Improved Procedure (Law, Schmidt, and Hunter, 1994)
• A Test of Two Refinements in Procedures for Meta-Analysis (Law, Schmidt, and Hunter, 1994)
• The impact of research synthesis methods on industrial–organizational psychology: The road from pessimism to optimism about cumulative knowledge (DeGeest and Schmidt, 2011)
• Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings (Hunter, Schmidt, and Le, 2006)
• Correcting for Indirect Range Restriction in Meta-Analysis: Testing a New Meta-Analytic Procedure (Le and Schmidt, 2006)
• The Multifaceted Nature of Measurement Artifacts and Its Implications for Estimating Construct-Level Relationships (Le, Schmidt, and Putka, 2009)
• The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation (Le, Schmidt, Harter, and Lauver, 2010)
• Generalizable Biographical Data Validity Can Be Achieved without Multi-Organizational Development and Keying (Carlson, Scullen, Schmidt, Rothstein, and Erwin, 1999)
• Rethinking the Validity of Interviews for Employment Decision Making (Oh, Postlethwaite, and Schmidt, 2012)
• Biographical Data in Employment Selection: Can Validities Be Made Generalizable? (Rothstein, Schmidt, Erwin, Owens, and Sparks, 1990)